Coastal → riverine → urban inland
Same country, same pathogen, same 26-year window — three radically different water regimes. Distance to the Bay of Bengal is the design variable, and it is what makes the gradient testable.
Chakaria HDSS
- Water bodies
- Matamuhuri river and estuary · Moheshkhali channel · Chakaria Sundarbans - former mangrove now converted to extensive SHRIMP AQUACULTURE PONDS · salt pans · Bay of Bengal within ~10 km of t…
- Trophic state
- Estuarine-brackish, strongly eutrophic in the shrimp-pond belt. Salinity gradient from fresh (east, hilly) to fully marine (west).
- Ocean colour applies
- YES — direct exposure
- Datasets
- 16 apply 8 partial 2 not applicable
- Variables
- BLOOM_AREACHL_OCXFAIMCIMNDWINDCIPHENOLOGYPHYCOCYANINSWMTURBIDITY
Matlab HDSS
- Water bodies
- Meghna river (2-6 km wide), Dhonagoda river, Gumti, canals, beels, thousands of household ponds
- Trophic state
- Meso- to eutrophic. Agricultural nutrient runoff · high suspended sediment.
- Ocean colour applies
- REGIONAL FORCING ONLY
- Datasets
- 11 apply 11 partial 4 not applicable
- Variables
- BLOOM_AREAFAIMCIMNDWINDCIPHENOLOGYPHYCOCYANINTURBIDITY
Dhaka City
- Water bodies
- Hatirjheel, Gulshan/Banani/Dhanmondi/Ramna/Crescent lakes · Buriganga, Turag, Balu, Shitalakshya rivers · Tongi Khal · thousands of ponds
- Trophic state
- Hyper-eutrophic. Heavy untreated sewage and industrial load. Dense, persistent cyanobacterial blooms.
- Ocean colour applies
- REGIONAL FORCING ONLY
- Datasets
- 9 apply 6 partial 11 not applicable
- Variables
- BLOOM_AREAFAIMNDWINDCIPHENOLOGYPHYCOCYANINTURBIDITY
Why the gradient is the point
The three sites form a COASTAL -> RIVERINE -> URBAN INLAND gradient. This is the study design's greatest strength: the classic coastal-chlorophyll/plankton-intrusion hypothesis (Lobitz 2000, Jutla 2013, Constantin de Magny 2008) should be STRONGEST at Chakaria, INTERMEDIATE at Matlab, and WEAKEST at Dhaka, where local eutrophic pond and lake blooms should dominate instead. That gradient is directly testable and has never been published.
Known problems in the site geometry
The shapefile carries 251 polygons across three upazilas: Matlab Uttar (112), Matlab Dakkhin (96) and Daudkandi (43) — which is in Cumilla district, outside the HDSS. 42 of those 43 sit in Block E. Filter them out before extraction (208 remain) or Block E is 56% contaminated with no matching population denominator.
Separately, the village ID (vid) is populated in
8 of 251 records, and 251 polygons carry only 245 distinct names — so a name-based join to the
HDSS outcome data is not safe either.
The boundary file is a single polygon with only OBJECTID, Shape_Leng and Shape_Area. The 11 unions described in the config are not in it. The east side is hilly and the west is coastal lowland with the shrimp-pond belt — completely different hydrology and salinity. Either request the union-level shapefile, or derive the stratum from SRTM elevation ≤ 5 m combined with distance to coast.
Pooling the two halves averages away exactly the exposure contrast the study is trying to detect.